International Conference "Coordinating Engineering for Sustainability
and Resilience" CESARE'22 follows the highest standards of publication
ethics and it takes all measures necessary to prevent publication
committee does not accept any type of plagiarism. This means that works
replicating another author's work without acknowledging him/her shall
be automatically disqualified. All authors submitting their papers to
CESARE'22 affirm that their papers are their own creations and have not
been copied in whole or in part from other works.
paper is reviewed anonymously by at least two independent reviewers to
ensure the final high standard and quality of the CESARE'22. The
communication between the reviewers and authors is managed by and
conducted through the editor-in-chief.
Conference Editors, Conference committees, and the Reviewers are the
body to ultimately decide which papers are publishable in CESARE'22.
Their decision is based on a number of factors: compliance with formal
requirements, possession of permits to reprint/republish excerpts in the
papers, relevance of the paper in terms of scientific research the
following Engineering disciplines:
· Structural materials
· Structural engineering
· Structural robustness
· Earthquake engineering
· Fire engineering
· Climate changes
· Risk management
· Geotechnical engineering
· Building physics
· Environmental engineering
· Fluid mechanics
· Transportation and Electric transportation
· Sustainable product design
· Industrial ecology
· Design strategies for product design and engineering
· Sustainability from the health perspective
· Road management
· Restoration and rehabilitation of monuments and historical buildings
· Energy systems / Sustainable energy systems
· Electric power
· Renewable energy
· Wind energy structures
· Energy islands
· Facade engineering
· Green technology for civil and aeronautical engineering
· Advanced reactors and safety
· Green buildings
· Waste management
the reviewing process, the reviewers help the author improve the paper
to match the respective requirements, objectify the research findings,
etc. The papers received/reviewed by the reviewers are treated with
Duties of Conference Editors
conference editors of CESARE'22 are responsible for deciding which of
the articles submitted to the conference should be published. The
conference editors at any time evaluate manuscripts for their
intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation,
religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy
of the authors.
Duties of Authors
of reports of original research should present an accurate account of
the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its
significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the
paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit
others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate
statements constitute unethical behavior are unacceptable.
authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works,
and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this
has been appropriately cited or quoted.
author should not, in general, publish articles describing essentially
the same research in more than one journal or primary publication.
Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently
constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In
general, an author should not submit for consideration in another
journal a previously published paper. Proper acknowledgment of the work
of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that
have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to
the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported
study. All those who have made significant contributions should be
listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in
certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be
acknowledged or listed as contributors.
corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and
no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all
co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and
have agreed to its submission for publication.
an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own
published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the
CESARE'22 editor and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the
author intends not to use any copyrighted material for the publication
or, if not possible, to indicate the copyright of the respective object.
copyright for any material created by the author is reserved. Any
duplication or use of objects such as images, diagrams, sounds, or texts
in other electronic or printed publications is not permitted without
the author's agreement.
preliminarily editors' evaluation, the papers which are considered
suitable for possible publication will be transferred to the review
stage. In this stage, two referees will be invited to review the article
submission. When their reports have been completed, the author will be
informed of the editor's decision considering the papers' final
acceptability for publication in the CESARE'22.
evaluate manuscripts using several criteria including originality of
the works, scholarly relevance, professional relevance, completeness of
the works, acknowledgment of the works of others by references,
organization of the manuscripts, and clarity in writing, tables, graphs,
Duties of Reviewers
selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported
in a paper or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should
notify the editor and excuse himself/herself from the review process.
papers received for review must be treated as confidential documents.
They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized
by the editor.
should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is
inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with
should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the
authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had
been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation.
A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial
similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any
other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept
confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not
consider papers in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from
competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with
any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.